Sign in or 
Location: Wetpaint Central Rules
Discussion: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Category:
Discussion Forum /
General Discussion
Share this
CaptainSpaz |
Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 14 2010, 9:12 PM EST
As of February 14, 2010, the rules are now organized into sections.Please be sure to reread the rules in case you wish to cite them in any warning threads. No rules have been deleted, they have only been moved around. -Phillip Do you find this valuable? |
CryingDove |
1. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 14 2010, 9:18 PM EST
So they are the same except for reference numbers correct?
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
CaptainSpaz |
2. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 14 2010, 9:21 PM EST
Yes.Now instead of having Rule #1-2x, there are sections such as: Discussion forum, and then letters. So, if someone posted an advertisement, I would say they broke Section #1a. Do you find this valuable? |
|
CryingDove |
3. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 14 2010, 9:24 PM EST
You may want to correct the Moderators list Column 3. Row 2Steve and TemlynWriting are hooked up to each other. Do you find this valuable? |
|
CaptainSpaz |
4. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 14 2010, 9:25 PM EST
I should probably just delete all the names except for those of the regular community mods who are active most of the time.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
CryingDove |
5. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 14 2010, 9:26 PM EST
You wouldn't have very much of a list then
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
CryingDove |
6. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 14 2010, 10:00 PM EST
This thread is for WPC moderators and up, correct. They are the only ones that can issue a warning.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
CaptainSpaz |
7. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 14 2010, 10:20 PM EST
Well, I wasn't the one who put that particular line in, but I don't mind if the registered users post it in the threads. Moderators are the only ones who should be PMing though. Do you find this valuable? |
chrisco97 |
8. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 14 2010, 11:36 PM EST
I think they look way better. I like how it is sections. Good job Phillip!
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
CaptainSpaz |
9. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 15 2010, 12:29 AM EST
And that table of contents I added to the top would be much better if we had Anchor Link capabilities.
Do you find this valuable?
|
walrusworldstudios |
10. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 15 2010, 2:03 AM EST
I completed the Table of Contents for you Phillip. The anchor links are fully functional and operational.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
CaptainSpaz |
11. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 15 2010, 2:05 AM EST
How did you do that?I didn't know we could do anchor links. Thanks, by the way. Do you find this valuable? |
|
walrusworldstudios |
12. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 15 2010, 2:10 AM EST
| Post edited: Feb 15 2010, 2:19 AM EST
No problem. I sent a message addressing this issue. Splats also has a tutorial:http://splats2.wetpaint.com/page/Easily+create+named+anchors Do you find this valuable? |
|
CaptainSpaz |
13. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 15 2010, 2:12 AM EST
Do you find the section system easier to navigate than the list of rules we had before?
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
walrusworldstudios |
14. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 15 2010, 2:16 AM EST
Yes, I feel it is much easier to find different rules. It works a lot better, IMO.
Do you find this valuable?
|
budde |
15. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 16 2010, 11:40 PM EST
Nice job, CaptainSpaz and WWS!
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
CaptainSpaz |
16. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 16 2010, 11:56 PM EST
I'm glad I was able to get the most important rule above the fold for the first time.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
CaptainSpaz |
17. RE: Wetpaint Central Rules have been redone
Feb 17 2010, 8:24 PM EST
Update:Because a slight misinterpretation was brought to my attention, I have added a line of text to Section 1a in regards to advertising a service. It is permissible to advertise a service, such as a photo editing program, if it is in response to a relevant Q&A thread. I hope this clears a few things up. Do you find this valuable? |
