Location: Wetpaint Central Discussion Forum

Discussion: Warrior CatsReported This is a featured thread

Category: Discussion Forum / General Discussion
Showing 1 - 14 of 14  |  Show  posts at a time
scienceman009
scienceman009
Warrior Cats
Jan 21 2009, 5:07 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 21 2009, 5:07 PM EST
There are way too many warrior cats wikis. Like one out of every five of the wetpaint 500 sites are warrior cats. Every one should just join together and have one wiki, so that there is more room in the wetpaint 500. Sites like mine that are for a cause( global warming) should be more aboundant. My site is:
www.bigcooldown.com
~Scienceman009 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)
ripplesong
ripplesong
1. RE: Warrior Cats
Jan 21 2009, 5:12 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 21 2009, 5:12 PM EST
The problem with this idea is that the site would get over-populated and everyone would be complaining about something or other. 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
scienceman009
scienceman009
2. RE: Warrior Cats
Jan 21 2009, 5:16 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 21 2009, 5:16 PM EST
"The problem with this idea is that the site would get over-populated and everyone would be complaining about something or other."
I know, but the person that does the wetpaint 500 should make sure only 1 or 2 warrior cats sites get on.

~Scienceman009 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Johnnygun
Johnnygun
3. RE: Warrior Cats
Jan 21 2009, 5:21 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 21 2009, 5:21 PM EST
Yes, I agree. 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
scienceman009
scienceman009
4. RE: Warrior Cats
Jan 21 2009, 5:22 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 21 2009, 5:22 PM EST
"Yes, I agree."
Thank you! 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

KimberlyB
5. RE: Warrior Cats
Jan 21 2009, 5:22 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 21 2009, 5:22 PM EST
"I know, but the person that does the wetpaint 500 should make sure only 1 or 2 warrior cats sites get on.

~Scienceman009"
The Wetpaint 500 is statistically generated. There is no person that does the Wetpaint 500. It's based on volume of contributions added to the site, both page edits and thread replies. 3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
scienceman009
scienceman009
6. RE: Warrior Cats
Jan 21 2009, 5:29 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 21 2009, 5:29 PM EST
"The Wetpaint 500 is statistically generated. There is no person that does the Wetpaint 500. It's based on volume of contributions added to the site, both page edits and thread replies. "
You are so smart, thanks! But we still need to do something about the aboundancy of warrion cats sites. Any Ideas? Do you find this valuable?    
AuroraPelt
AuroraPelt
7. RE: Warrior Cats
Jan 21 2009, 6:16 PM EST | Post edited: Jan 21 2009, 6:16 PM EST
"You are so smart, thanks! But we still need to do something about the aboundancy of warrion cats sites. Any Ideas?"
I don't think anything can be done about it. A lot of people like role-playing warrior cats, you can't really tell them to just stop. Combining it into one site would be Way too over-crowded, like Ripplesong said. Warrior cat clans 2 (#1 wiki) has more than 3,500 members. As for the Wetpaint 500, it's not due to the fact that there are so many warrior cat sites that it's taking up all the space, it due to the fact that those sites are active. There are thousands of wetpaint sites and only 500 spots. You can get your site on the Wetpaint 500 by making your site active.
p.s. Wouldn't joining all the warrior cat fans together in one site make that site super active? If that happens, then no one would get a fair chance of being able to get on Top #1 wiki spot.
~Auroraz~ Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
8. RE: Warrior Cats
Feb 20 2009, 8:42 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 20 2009, 8:42 AM EST
you guys...GET A LIFE!!
 Do you find this valuable?    
Crystalfrost
Crystalfrost
9. RE: Warrior Cats
Feb 20 2009, 9:20 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 20 2009, 9:20 AM EST
i think that instead of making NEW warriors sites, people should join already existing ones... but about the crowding thing, some people don't like having 1000 other people on the site 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Sophy-chan
Sophy-chan
10. RE: Warrior Cats
Feb 20 2009, 9:28 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 20 2009, 9:28 AM EST
I'm not really bothered by the fact that there are so many, but by the fact they are beginning to look the same. People ran out of ideas, but still make them. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Crystalfrost
Crystalfrost
11. RE: Warrior Cats
Feb 20 2009, 9:29 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 20 2009, 9:29 AM EST
i might be repetitive, but my site isn't like any of them. it's not even truely a warriors site anymore, seeing how you can rp just about anything 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Sophy-chan
Sophy-chan
12. RE: Warrior Cats
Feb 20 2009, 9:35 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 20 2009, 9:35 AM EST
I wasn't talking about your site. I was just saying that some sites have a lot of similarities. (they have 4 clans with different names, but which do almost the same things, etc.). And, yes, you're right about that. There are a lot of stuff you can rp about. It's just that people don't seem to see that. 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Crystalfrost
Crystalfrost
13. RE: Warrior Cats
Feb 20 2009, 9:42 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 20 2009, 9:42 AM EST
i think that it's ok there are so many, people might not want to rp with other people, just their friends on their own site. and eventually the trend will switch to something else and there'll be millinos of those... like Twilight 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?