Location: Wetpaint: The Company

Discussion: Infrastructure and backupsReported This is a featured thread

Category: Discussion Forum / General Discussion
Showing 5 posts

georgeroberts
Infrastructure and backups
Nov 19 2006, 9:57 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 19 2006, 9:57 AM EST
Hi
Thanks for WetPaint. Just wondering about robustness and persistence. What kind of regime do you operate to keep clients' work secure/backed-up and what do you envisage for the future? Should there be a need can we export sites as content packages?
Thanks
George 9  out of 9 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)
Nitpicker
Nitpicker
1. RE: Infrastructure and backups
Feb 2 2008, 1:25 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 2 2008, 1:25 AM EST
Given the work that people put into wikis, it seems important to understand what precautions are being take to assure that content is secure against expectable disk crashes etc. So why has this set of questions remained unanswered for a year? Do you find this valuable?    
jeremy_wetpaint
jeremy_wetpaint
2. RE: Infrastructure and backups
Feb 2 2008, 1:31 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 2 2008, 1:31 AM EST
"Given the work that people put into wikis, it seems important to understand what precautions are being take to assure that content is secure against expectable disk crashes etc. So why has this set of questions remained unanswered for a year?"
Whoa, this is an old thread. If you look at the details of our last release you'll find there is a 'Site Backup' feature. See http://www.wetpaintcentral.com/page/01%2F14%2F08+-+release for details. 1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Nitpicker
Nitpicker
3. RE: Infrastructure and backups
Feb 2 2008, 11:02 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 2 2008, 11:02 AM EST
Thanks. Now the thread has a sensible conclusion. Previously, one got a very different impression from reading the one element thread.

I suggest that old material which is no longer relevant ought to be removed, lest some hapless reader might be misled by it.

Hapless Reader Do you find this valuable?    

Jason_wetpaint
4. RE: Infrastructure and backups
Feb 2 2008, 3:57 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 2 2008, 3:57 PM EST
Someone might get the wrong impression if they went digging for old threads instead of reading the latest information that we provide to all of our users.

There's nothing offensive about this content, so we won't be deleting it. Do you find this valuable?