Sign in or 
Location: Page Formatting Tips
Discussion: This is ridiculous.
Category:
Discussion Forum /
General Discussion
Share this|
Posted Anonymously |
|
CryingDove |
1. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 21 2009, 7:38 PM EDT
"It's fine! Proboards and webs, here I come...Why would you want a petition if you are going to proboards and webs? Do you find this valuable? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
2. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 21 2009, 7:47 PM EDT
Because, I love wetpaint how it is. WETPAINT IS PERFECT RIGHT NOW. If it changes, it won't be worth using anymore.
Do you find this valuable?
|
Baby_Apple |
3. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 21 2009, 7:51 PM EDT
Why does your Wiki need the extra page width?
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
4. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 21 2009, 7:55 PM EDT
What I mean is, I'll have to redo stuff. And I know most of my users will hate this, and leave. I've already seen people thinking about it. My site will be deserted!
Do you find this valuable?
|
DeansGirl666 |
5. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 23 2009, 5:48 PM EDT
it looks fine in my opinion. my site is already converted and i havnt heard any complaints from any of the members. in fact, a lot of the registered users took to the challenge to help reformat and with registered users volunteering to reformat the unlocked pages and the moderators and myself doing the locked pages, the site looks great, more so than it did before i think. i now never have to wonder "will this page look crappy on a small screen because its formatted for a large screen??" it satisfies every size screen and looks good. see for yourself:http://supernaturalfanwiki.wetpaint.com/page/Sympathy+for+the+Devil Do you find this valuable? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
6. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 23 2009, 8:56 PM EDT
"it looks fine in my opinion. my site is already converted and i havnt heard any complaints from any of the members. in fact, a lot of the registered users took to the challenge to help reformat and with registered users volunteering to reformat the unlocked pages and the moderators and myself doing the locked pages, the site looks great, more so than it did before i think. i now never have to wonder "will this page look crappy on a small screen because its formatted for a large screen??" it satisfies every size screen and looks good. see for yourself:Really? People are leaving Wetpaint in droves due to this "upgrade"!!!!!! The private Wiki debacle, layout disasters and "official" silence and very, very poor customer support. Wetpaint is in trouble. I don't know if they even know or understand it. Do you find this valuable? |
Naru2008 |
7. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 23 2009, 9:15 PM EDT
"Really?No one liked the improvements at first. I was one of them. Those people who are leaving Wetpaint are lazy, i'm sorry, but they are. Too lazy to just make their site Public, then back to Private. Now they are too lazy to make a few adjustments to pages. I mean, they weren't too lazy to make and edit all of the pages, but they are too lazy to just change this small little part. It really isn't that bad an update. Your not a customer unless you use services such as: Custom Domains and Add-free Sites. Also, I object to Wetpaint giving poor services, because it is not true. They have given us fixes to these things. Wetpaint is not in trouble. If they were, they would know it, so you are wrong there as well. Youl are the ones who doesn't understand these changes. People who are loyal to Wetpaint, like me, will stay. -Alex, WPC RU Do you find this valuable? |
awesomegamingstaff |
8. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 23 2009, 9:57 PM EDT
| Post edited: Oct 23 2009, 9:58 PM EDT
"It's fine! Proboards and webs, here I come...Here is a petition: http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/wetpaintpageresize Do you find this valuable? |
|
Baby_Apple |
9. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 23 2009, 10:02 PM EDT
| Post edited: Oct 23 2009, 10:06 PM EDT
Wetpaint has worked very hard on this update, and they are not going to erase their code. If you would like to create a petition, then do so, but know that it will not change anything.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
awesomegamingstaff |
10. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 23 2009, 10:12 PM EDT
Nobody wants this. I don't have time to go through a (over 1,000) page wiki and fix a bunch of pages. It is a lot, and there should be other options or ways...
Do you find this valuable?
|
BrandonE |
11. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 23 2009, 10:15 PM EDT
I agree with you JJ, I do most of the housekeeping on my wiki, and I really don't want to go edit 500 pages.
Do you find this valuable?
|
shadowmlb |
12. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 23 2009, 10:26 PM EDT
I'm not happy, but the update is coming, so you may as well get use to things. Start getting your wiki prepared for the update now, that may you will have less work to do when the time finally comes. Also it helps if you can get some of your moderators and administrators to help out. The job will get done pretty quickly.
Do you find this valuable?
|
DerCat |
13. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 24 2009, 9:31 AM EDT
I don't want the stupid bars on each side of the page. it's ugly. I already started a webs site, but webs sucks. since the site name has to be a username and moderators can't edit.
Do you find this valuable?
|
DerSpanier |
14. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 24 2009, 9:39 AM EDT
"I'm not happy, but the update is coming, so you may as well get use to things. Start getting your wiki prepared for the update now, that may you will have less work to do when the time finally comes. Also it helps if you can get some of your moderators and administrators to help out. The job will get done pretty quickly. "I agree completely. Adding nothing to that statement. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Fermi |
15. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 24 2009, 1:05 PM EDT
| Post edited: Oct 24 2009, 1:09 PM EDT
I dont see the problem with the dynamic resizing we have now a fixed width on 1024 pixel the sites will look ridiculous for those who have high resolution
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Fermi |
16. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 24 2009, 1:07 PM EDT
"Wetpaint has worked very hard on this update, and they are not going to erase their code."If it aint' broke, don't fix it. update=downgrade in this case Do you find this valuable? |
|
1#brave |
17. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 24 2009, 2:25 PM EDT
You know, it only took around one hour to fix all the pages here. There are several hundred pages here, almost all with images and tables. Did you know Yahoo uses a widescreen format?
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
18. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 24 2009, 3:57 PM EDT
"I don't want the stupid bars on each side of the page. it's ugly. I already started a webs site, but webs sucks. since the site name has to be a username and moderators can't edit."I use HTML/CSS on Webs. Not the free template crap. Do you find this valuable? |
|
BrandonE |
19. RE: This is ridiculous.
Oct 24 2009, 4:19 PM EDT
This was because Wetpaint Central had mods spliting the working on it. In my case, it's only me, with 500 pages.
Do you find this valuable?
|
