Sign in or 
Location: Banning Users
Discussion: Seriously people
Category:
Discussion Forum /
General Discussion
Share this
Showing 8 posts
|
Posted Anonymously |
|
Madusha |
1. RE: Seriously people
Jun 8 2009, 3:55 AM EDT
In my opinion, a ban for inactivity is unacceptable. However, the wiki Mods, Admins and the creator decide what happens.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
yy10 |
2. RE: Seriously people
Jun 8 2009, 5:46 AM EDT
I agree. Banning inactive people will actually ruin your whole site and scare everybody out of it.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
tanyasudan |
3. RE: Seriously people
Jun 8 2009, 5:56 AM EDT
yeah i too stand by that.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
IamaCrazyBumbleBee |
4. RE: Seriously people
Jun 11 2009, 1:11 AM EDT
*nods* Banning from inactivity will only cause trouble. They should've messaged you with a warning, if they were going to do anything.
Do you find this valuable?
|
BrandonE |
5. RE: Seriously people
Jun 11 2009, 1:50 AM EDT
"I agree. Banning inactive people will actually ruin your whole site and scare everybody out of it."I also agree. It does ruin the number of members the site has. Do you find this valuable? |
|
yy10 |
6. RE: Seriously people
Jun 11 2009, 5:11 AM EDT
Yup. I suggest you only ban people when they've done really serious things, like swear, offend people, or even hack you site.
Do you find this valuable?
|
DerSpanier |
7. RE: Seriously people
Jun 11 2009, 10:05 AM EDT
*nods* Yes, that is a dangerous thing to do. However, a staff demotion for MONTHS of inactivity couldn't really hurt. Like admin to mod or something
Do you find this valuable?
|
