Thread started: Mar 4 2008, 5:38 PM EST
Watch
My experience has been a bit mixed. I like the high-level view but doing pathway analysis for particular URLs can be challenging, considering that they treat URLs with different name-value-pairs as distinct URLs.
For example, if I have a urls that are http://www.mysite.com/Foo.do?p=1 and Foo.do?p=2, you can't do an aggregate pathway analysis of just Foo.do for example.
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: What do you think of google analytics?
By: ,
May 9 2008, 5:30 PM EDT
I think it's better than SiteMeter because you don't have to have multiple login names for each of your wikis (if you have more than one). Also google analytics is better at displaying the wiki stats because it uses charts and graphs to display the information. I have tried using SiteMeter but I got fed up with it and in my view google analytics is better at this stuff. It helps when you've got five wikis about different subjects and you only need the one login name. I rate it as excellent. :D
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|