Well then Riley, let me try to clear up the confusion.

Wetpaint had apparently been receiving multiple complaints about Terms of Service violations due to wikis breaking the Terms of Service. On January 17, 2013 AlexWeinstein, the Head of Technology at Wetpaint posted the thread below explaining what had been going on:
http://www.wetpaintcentral.com/thread/5073989/Update+from+Wetpaint

He says that they will be blocking wikis that violate ToS and cease creation of new Wetpaint Wikis until they can deploy stricter ways to enforce the Terms of Service.
The problem is that we haven't had the server upgrades, and the Wiki Creator hasn't been restored, as it is still redirecting here to Wetpaint Central. Until they decide to restore it, no one can create new wikis. Educators who want to create new wikis will need to be using old sites by banning old members, deleting content, and starting fresh. The rest of the community will just have to wait and see when and if they restore the Wiki Creator.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

Please read the homepage. You are taken to the homepage, and in red bold letters says to read the message below about creating new wikis before posting a thread.
http://www.wetpaintcentral.com

Thread locked.

-Clay

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

Avatars appear in 5 different places, with different dimensions. (width x height)
1. Members list 90 x90
2. Community Activity 50 x 50
3. Profile 90 x 90
4. Threads 50 x 50
5. Latest Page Update 50 x 50

Wetpaint will resize the image to fit those dimensions.

One exception is with the height. The maximum height for a profile avatar is 635 pixels. The maximum width for any avatar is 90 pixels wide. If a rectangular avatar is used it will be resized for the different areas used.

e.g
If an avatar used is 90 x 635, then
profile = will remain at the 90 x what ever height used but no more than 635. ( no resizing )
page update = 50 x 200 (image will be resized)
threads = 50 x 200 (image will be resized)
member list = 90x 90 (image will be resized)

That being said, if your image is smaller than the 90 x 90 profile default, WP is going to resize the width to fit the 90 pixel dimension. Depending upon the source image quality, the resizing may cause pixelation, striations or distortions to appear in the avatar. It is optimal to set the width dimensions of the original image to 90 pixels before uploading it as a profile avatar. If not WP is going to resize the image for you and the results may not be desirable.

***** The above applies to static avatars only. Animated avatars have different sets of criteria.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

To confuse things. There are a couple of statements and questions that are contradictory to Google's use of robot.txt in the search results of these two pages.

STATEMENTS
1. Google has not re-indexed non-popular sites in a long time. Splats2 went private 3 months ago. The only results shown are "cached" results stating Splats2 is no longer open to the public. It was non-privatized 2 months ago,
2. The two page links noted by Violeta09 are only missing the description, but are still links to those pages on the Google results list.
3. Other search engines show them with descriptions. Bing, Dogpile, etc
4. Wetpaint uses robots no-index no follow meta-tag statement on wiki pages. This meta-tag has been in use for as long as I can remember viewing WP codes. Perhaps since the beginning in 2006.

QUESTIONS
1. If Wetpaint has a robot.txt file (Which I do not think they do. They use meta tag no-index no-follow). that would mean every page on the wiki would display the "A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more." message. Why just those two pages.
2. Why is the complete URL for a page being searched on? Why search for a page by its URL only to have the search results return the page URL?

STATEMENTS 2
1. Google has been making changes to their search engine recently. I would imagine some unexpected results will occur, such as seen in this thread. If and when the changes are completed and feedback is reviewed by Google, and the results remain the same with the robot.txt message, then WP may want to visit this area.(But, I don't think they will)
2. Violeta09, using a forward slash( / ) mark in a page title is a bad practice. Slash marks are used to designate sub-directories or sub-pages. This may create some unexpected results along the line.

This post is open for any answers or statements by others.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

Rich provided a link to a page to his wiki, Crying Dove, above, which at the bottom of the page describes how to add code to the embed code supplied to you by YouTube to make videos autoplay.

-Clay

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

Wetpaint has the new wiki making on hold at this time and we are unsure when it will be available again. Please keep checking the home page every so often for an update. We are hoping it will be in May some time when new sites can be created.

1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you find this valuable? Do you?    

On the contrary, I've edited table cells with "invisible borders" and they -still- revert back to the previous cell color. I use Mozilla Firefox, so what you are describing is not a fix. In some instances, after you've edited the table cells and saved the new color scheme, it still reverts back to the previous color scheme as if no edits had been made. And no, refreshing the page 2-3 times doesn't help. I do not think the border-types have anything to do with this as I have edited table cells with "thick", "solid", and "double" borders but the aforementioned problems did not occur. The "user inputs" are the same, but the "visual/ textual outputs" seem to be different for everyone. Ever since I created a new wiki (in October 2012) for an online collaborative fiction, I have not experienced any of these problems but I did experience them while maintaining an older RPG website, whose pages had been edited/ revised countless times over a 4-year period. By creating new page templates and deleting old/ outdated page templates, these problems seem to lose their frequency/ consistency but I cannot say this for certain, as this is through empirical evidence alone and I cannot account for the multiplicity of edits that users on other wikis might've made to their pages to bring about these problems. It is not a solution, by any means, but it is a suggestion.

The workaround that CryingDove spelled out for you is the only effective way to go about dealing with the "table cell glitch", albeit time-consuming. Keep in mind, though, that it doesn't always work 100%, especially for people who live in a "dead-zone" where there are constant fluctuations and/ or unexpected "flatlines" in internet connectivity, or for people whose wireless routers are malfunctioning and/ or put out a weak WLAN signal, with no means of extension or signal amplification.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

The tools you are seeing are the only tools available for the user settings on this wiki.

See the answer given in your previous post.

http://www.wetpaintcentral.com/thread/5109048/Sociocultural+Project+%28+Saudi+Arabia%29

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

I'll pass it on to be blocked/deleted. Thanks for reporting it, Spycynder.

-Clay

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

Also, banning someone doesn't just delete their account. It also makes the site unviewable for them. If they are readers only, as bellswebster said, banning them disables them from doing so. I would suggest just not worrying about the inactive accounts. Every site has members that aren't active.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?